In what ways do the context and sensibilities of art research relate to the contexts and sensibilities of R/research in the arts and sciences and to what ends? And more particularly, how might site-specific art practice provide a model for R/research in the humanities and sciences? More particularly still, how might the reflectivity/reflexivity underpinning this approach activate R/research to make it more critically responsive to its various contexts?

By asking and (re)asking these questions at Figurations of Knowledge (Berlin, June 2008), Future Reflections Research Group (represented by Katrina and Marsha) attempted to situate art R/research within the broader context of R/research, especially in relation to the conference's theme:  Research in the arts and sciences. Repetition figured prominently throughout this performative presentation. The presenters played with conference conventions including the role played by the host institute in legitimating the knowledge disseminated at the conference; the presenters' practics of sipping water create a moment of pause; and the ways in which PowerPoints flatten R/research “findings" as bullet points and imagery.

In what ways do the context and sensibilities of art research relate to the contexts and sensibilities of R/research in the arts and sciences and to what ends? And more particularly, how might site-specific art practice provide a model for R/research in the humanities and sciences? More particularly still, how might the reflectivity/reflexivity underpinning this approach activate R/research to make it more critically responsive to its various contexts?

Conference Description: Recent and current research in Science Studies has devoted increasing attention to semantic transfers, translations, and changes of register between forms of knowledge. In terms of studying the relationship between literature, science, and the arts, this implies a general reinterpretation of how scientific knowledge affects literature and the arts or how it is represented in them. For the 'and' linking established oppositional pairs such as 'art and science,' 'literature and science,' or else 'sciences and humanities' ultimately presumes a homogeneous situation on both respective sides. It is only under this precondition that the clear dichotomies between knowledge cultures can be formed which are so powerful within the system of modern science. Yet the arts—as well as the historical and hermeneutic disciplines—have always worked empirically, and the sciences have long dealt with questions calling for the interpretative capacity of the humanities or the creative potential of the arts: questions such as those about free will or consciousness.

The 2008 European Conference of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA) will therefore focus on such transitional phenomena with their historical, conceptual, and epistemological conditions. In contrast to the persistent tendency of science theory, science history, and science policies to fall back on the 'two cultures' model, we intend to examine how knowledge figures both historically and presently within the plurality and heterogeneity of knowledge cultures, i.e. in different respective functional contexts. The perspective of figurations of knowledge draws on the multiple meanings of the notions figure and figuration—from the symbolism of mathematical, geometric, or diagrammatic figures to figurality and figuration in rhetoric and iconography up to figural interpretation as an interpretative tool—, in order to delineate the specific ways in which knowledge is produced, distributed, and received in the interplay of schematization and dynamization, of empiricism and speculation, of measurement and interpretation. Thus, figurations of knowledge are understood to be instances of thought, speech, imagery, and experiment in which crossovers between literature, science, and the arts are essential.